Pay Back Calculation - A Case study for New Installation.
         
Pay Back Period in Months.
6.38
The input Current of the 100 Tube lights with Conventional Chokes        =         0.41A X 100
41A
The input Current of the 100 Tube lights with eChoke electronic Chokes= 0.13A X 100
13A
Typical energy saving Calculations using an eChoke electronic ballast in comparision
with Magnetic Choke Running for 24 Hours a day. Number of Tube lights  100
         
Sr. No. PARTICULARS BASIS MAGNETIC CHOKE ELECTRONIC CHOKE
A BALLAST COST      
1 ELECTRONIC BALLAST QTY.
100
   
2 ELECTRONIC BALLAST @ OF Rs.
375
 
37,500.00
3 MAGNETIC BALLAST QTY.
100
   
4 MAGNETIC BALLAST @ OF Rs.
180
18,000.00
 
  (Inclusive of Starter & Capacitor)      
  (Standard Philips / Compton Chokes)      
         
B CONSUMPTION CALCULATION      
1 CONSUMPTION PER ONE TUBE LIGHT (W)  
45.00W
28.00W
2 NO. OF TUBE LIGHTS
100
 4,500.00W
2,800.00W
3 KWH FOR A DAY WITH HOURS PER DAY
12
54.000
33.600
4 COST OF UNIT CONMSUMPTION AT RS.
5
270.00
168.00
5 CONSUMPTION COST FOR A MONTH WITH DAYS
30
8,100.00
5,040.00
         
C COST SAVING CALCULATIONS      
1 MONTHLY INCREMENTAL SAVINGS    
3,060.00
2 YEARLY SAVINGS    
36720.00
         
D

PAY BACKCALCULATIONS

     
1 INITIAL INVESTMENT FOR BALLASTS  
18,000.00
37,500.00
2 ADDITIONAL INITIAL INVESTMENT    
19,500.00
3 TOTAL MONTHLY SAVINGS    
3,060.00
4 PAY BACK PERIOD IN MONTHS    
6.38
         
NOTE: AVERAGE MAGNETIC CONSUMPTION IS ASSUMED 45 W.
ALL MEASUREMENTS AT 240V. 50hz.
MORE ENERGY CAN BE SAVED IN A.C. DUE TO LESS HEAT LOAD ON A.C.